CSR vs SSR Comparison

Detailed analysis of advantages and disadvantages of each rendering method

← Home

📊 Detailed Performance Comparison

Evaluation of important metrics between CSR and SSR

MetricsCSR (Client Side)SSR (Server Side)
First Contentful Paint
Slow
Must load JS and fetch data first
Fast
HTML has content immediately
Time to Interactive
Fast
Immediate interaction after loading
Medium
Needs hydration for interaction
SEO Score
Poor
Crawler cannot see dynamic content
Excellent
HTML has complete content
Server Load
Low
Only serves static files
High
Must render HTML for each request
Initial Bundle Size
Large
Must load entire JS app
Small
Only needs HTML + minimal JS
Good
Average
Poor

🎯 When to use CSR?

  • Interactive applications (dashboard, admin panel)
  • Single Page Applications (SPA)
  • When SEO is not important
  • Frequently changing data
  • Want to reduce server load

🎯 When to use SSR?

  • News websites, blogs, e-commerce
  • SEO is top priority
  • Need fast First Contentful Paint
  • Users have slow network
  • Relatively static content

🚀 Hybrid Approach

Next.js 14+ App Router allows you to combine both CSR and SSR in the same application. Use SSR for pages that need SEO and CSR for interactive sections.

Server Components

Default SSR for SEO

Client Components

CSR with 'use client'

Static Generation

Best for performance